After struggling for a few years with its 2009-2012 generation CRF450R, Honda made great strides with its latest ‘13 version. The CRF went from a bike that few wanted to moto to one that saw the most number of hours on its clock. More than ever this CRF450 proves to be one of the most versatile dirt bikes we’ve ridden, as adept at pounding out laps at the track as it is at tackling skinny off-road trails or throwing sand roost out at the desert.
Aside from fitting a different handlebar bend based on preference, the next order of business with any dirt bike is a fresh set of tires. And while we thought Honda did well with its OE-fitted Geomax hoops, when it comes to knobs you simply can’t ride on a better brand than what Bridgestone offers with its M-series tires.
Available in three different compounds, we selected the intermediate-terrain specific M403/M404 combo in stock sizing (80/100-21 front, 120/80-19 rear). These tires have the highest amount of versatility in terms of terrain, offering excellent grip on dusty and dry hard-pack or deep, freshly watered loam. Visually the Bridgestone M403 Intermediate Front Tire has a deep and dense array of knobs giving it added bite during braking and through turns. The profile is also a little
We ditched the CRF450Rs stock plastic brake disc guard in order to let more air flow to dissipate heat during braking. We also slung on a intermediate terrain M403 tire from Bridgestone 80 100-21 . The tire offers superior traction than the stock Geomax over a wide variety of SoCal dirt.
Fox Shox digital pump is more accurate than the OE-supplied dial gauge-style pump displaying air pressure in increments of 0.5 psi.
(Top) We ditched the CRF450R’s stock plastic brake disc guard in order to let more air flow to dissipate heat during braking. We also slung on a intermediate terrain M403 tire from Bridgestone (80/100-21). The tire offers superior traction than the stock Geomax over a wide variety of SoCal dirt.
(Center 1) Fox Shox digital pump is more accurate than the OE-supplied dial gauge-style pump displaying air pressure in increments of 0.5 psi. (Bottom) We fitted a Kevin Windham racing replica graphics kit in honor of the legendary Supercross and motocross rider. The decals are thicker than stock and better resist pitting and sand blast from normal riding.
sharper than the stock rubber, netting quick turn-in without that flighty, overly anxious steering feel. Although Bridgestone recommends the tires be run anywhere from 10 to 15 psi, we ran the tires between 12.5-13 psi virtually everywhere except when riding in really rocky areas. In those circumstances we aired the tires to 14-15 psi to help avoid tube flats and/or a bent rim.
For 2013 Honda raised eyebrows by ditching its tried-and-true fork for one that uses air bladders in lieu of metal coil springs. While we appreciate the added tune-ability offered by being able to effectively “change the spring rate” by adding more or less air, the pneumatic fork is sensitive to pressure and requires constant attention, especially when riding for longer periods of time on rough tracks. Since we wanted more precise adjustment than we could get from the Honda-supplied pump, we sourced a Fox Shox Digital Shock Pump ($69.99). The device features a digital readout and measures air pressure in bar, kPa, and psi and can display it digitally in half psi increments. Depending on where we’re riding and the roughness of the terrain, we vary air pressure anywhere from 31-36 psi with the lower settings ideal for smoother and/or slower riding conditions.
Kevin Windham is one of the all-time greats of our sport. And in tribute of his lifelong racing career we adorned our CRF with a One Industries Team Geico Powersports Honda Replica Graphic. The kit comes with everything needed to convert a CRF450R into a racing replica. The graphics are pretty easy to apply but require patience. It also helps to have a heat gun or blow dryer in order to mitigate air bubbles between the plastic and the decals. The set-up also came with a new seat cover with special grip material which we installed with a staple gun after peeling the original off. The graphics have a much thicker finish than the stock ones and held up well to the constant bombardment of rocks, sand and dirt.
After racking up 42 hours on the hour meter the CRF is still running tip-top. So far, wear and tear consumables have included front and rear brake pads, fiber clutch plates, and two sets of chain/ sprockets. Aside from those parts and engine oil and filters, the Honda has proven to be a durable machine with no other components failing despite our best attempts.
For the next phase of our CRF450R project bike our good riding friend and nine-time AMA Loretta Lynn Amateur National Motocross Champ Kevin Foley is heading east to Tennessee in hopes of notching another win in the plus-50 vet class. Stay tuned for his report and good luck Kevin!
Thursday, 13 February 2014
2014 Honda CRF125F First Ride
Compression Ratio: 9.0:1
Fuel Delivery: 20mm piston-valve carburetor
Clutch: Wet, multi-plate, cable actuation
Transmission: Four-speed
Front Suspension: 31.0mm telescopic fork; 5.5 in. travel (standard) / 5.9 in. travel (big wheel)
Rear Suspension: Hydraulic shock absorber; 4.5 in. travel (standard) / 5.9 in. travel (big wheel)
Front Brake: 220mm cross-drilled hydraulic disc
Rear Brake: Mechanical drum
Wheels: 70/100-17 front, 90/100-14 rear (standard) 70/100-19 front, 90/100-16 rear (big wheel)
Curb Weight: 192 lbs. / 194 lbs. (big wheel)
Wheelbase: 48.0 in. / 49.4 in. (big wheel)
Seat Height: 28.9 in. / 30.9 in. (big wheel)
Fuel Capacity: 1.1 gallon
MSRP: $2799 (standad) / $3199 (big wheel)
Colors: Red
Warranty: Six months
Honda’s line of junior-sized dirt bikes has nurtured young riders for decades. And Big Red is poised to carry the newbie torch for years to come with its freshly released Honda CRF125F (starting at $2799). Available in standard and Big Wheel variations, Honda’s latest trail bike replaces the CRF80F and 100F models and offers owners more bang for their buck than ever before.
A fun ride and easy operation were the main goals for Honda’s latest trail bike. To achieve these, engineers fitted a larger displacement engine. Still air-cooled for simplicity sake, the 125cc four-stroke Single employs a longer piston stroke compared to the 80 and 100 CRFs boosting torque and making it more adept at tackling inclines or hills. The engine is still fueled through a carburetor and 1.1-gallon gas tank. Additionally, the motor can run on regular 87-octane gasoline instead of the more expensive premium blend.
Electric start was added and the engine lights with a simple push of the button. A kickstart lever remains as a backup in case the battery runs out of juice. Either method performed flawlessly and we were especially pleased by how little muscle the kickstart lever demanded.
Hondas venerable air-cooled four-stroke Single gets a longer stroke engine boosting displacement to 125cc.
Suspension was cozy for our 110-pound tester. This made it easy for her to get a feel for it on the dirt.
The cockpit of the CRF125F is neutral-feeling and functions well for tall and short riders alike. We also love that the CRF now offers the push-button convenience of electric start.
(Top) Honda’s venerable air-cooled four-stroke Single gets a longer stroke engine boosting displacement to 125cc. (Center) Suspension was cozy for our 110-pound tester. This made it easy for her to get a feel for it on the dirt. (Bottom) The cockpit of the CRF125F is neutral-feeling and functions well for tall and short riders alike. We also love that the CRF now offers the push-button convenience of electric start.
“It’s smooth,” says our lady tester and novice-level rider, Mayra Tinajero, when asked to describe the CRF’s motor performance. “When you go to give it throttle, the way it takes off is so easy. It’s never jerky and I always felt in control.”
Power is transferred to the back knobby tire through a four-speed transmission and manual, cable-actuated clutch. Lever pull is light yet has a positive and responsive actuation akin to a premium, full-sized motorcycle. Paired with the engine’s low-end grunt this CRF is easy to get moving forward from a standstill. Although the gearbox no longer offers fifth gear you won’t miss it due to the 125’s broader powerband.
“It’s really easy to shift,” shares Tinajero. “So for anybody new to riding that is stressed about controlling the throttle, the brake, your feet, just know that it’s really easy with the 125. That’s something that definitely alleviates the mind when you’re starting out.”
As she points out it is an easy-shifting bike that delivers precise feel at the shift lever along with an audible and reassuring thud when the next gear is engaged. Finding neutral position (between first and second gears) at a stop was equally simple.
The standard CRF125F rolls on 17-inch front and 14-inch rear spoked wheels with a seat height at 28.9 inches (identical to the outgoing CRF80F). Taller riders will appreciate the $400 more expensive Big Wheel which makes use of a larger 19/16-inch combo boosting saddle height by two inches and ground clearance by 2.1 inches (the same seat measurement as the ’13 CRF100F). It also uses a larger 49-tooth rear sprocket compared to the standard model’s 46-tooth piece (due to the larger diameter of the wheel).
Suspension and brakes are the same on both options, with a non-adjustable fork soaking up bumps at the front and a spring preload-adjustable shock providing rear damping. Front suspension travel is rated at 5.5 inches with the back measurement coming in at 4.5 inches for the standard model. The Big Wheel CRF gets added travel with nearly six inches fore and aft.
“The suspension was awesome,” said 110-pound Tinajero who spent most of the afternoon riding the standard model. “Going over any rough spots or jumps, and around turns it was great. It was smooth riding all the time.”
Hondas all-new CRF125F makes use of a larger engine that produces more torque. This not only makes it easier to ride but more fun too.
Both CRF125F models get a 220mm cross-drilled hydraulic disc brake up front.
Big smiles are what the CRF125F is all about. Its a great learning tool for beginners and plenty fun to play around for seasoned riders too.
(Top) Honda’s all-new CRF125F makes use of a larger engine that produces more torque. This not only makes it easier to ride but more fun, too. (Center) Both CRF125F models get a 220mm cross-drilled hydraulic disc brake up front. (Bottom) Big smiles are what the CRF125F is all about. It’s a great learning tool for beginners and plenty fun to play around for seasoned riders, too.
Braking components consist of a 220mm front cross-drilled disc clamped by a twin-piston caliper actuated hydraulically with a simple and more cost-oriented lever-operated drum brake keeping rear wheel speed in check. Both brakes provided effective stopping power and were easy to operate. Another plus is how grippy the OE tires are even on silty hard-pack.
While our 5’5” tester got along with the smaller wheeled version, she still felt the larger wheeled version would be the right one for someone her size.
“I felt a little big on the small one,” she said. “It was still comfortable and really fun to ride, but I think I would outgrow it kind of fast. If I had to choose, I’d probably go with the bigger one.”
Much to my surprise the larger wheeled CRF was adequate for my six-foot tall frame, too. Obviously I was a little cramped but not enough to keep me from blasting across berms all the while grinning like a Slurpee-drunk schoolboy beneath my helmet.
And that in essence is the coolest thing about the CRF125F—it’s friendly and non-intimidating for a novice yet still delivers adequate performance for more seasoned riders.
“I would completely recommend this bike for someone that is looking to start out riding and hasn’t necessarily had a whole lot of experience,” sums up Tinajero. “It’s definitely an excellent bike to start out on.”
Wednesday, 12 February 2014
2014 Honda CRF250R First Ride
Engine: 249cc liquid-cooled four-stroke Single; 4-valve
Bore x Stroke: 76.8 x 53.8mm
Compression Ratio: 13.5:1
Fuel Delivery: Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Clutch: Wet multi-plate; cable actuation
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive: Chain; 13/49
Fork: Showa 48mm fork; 16-position compression and 16-position rebound damping adjustment; 12.2 in. travel
Shock: Showa gas charged shock, 13-position low-speed and step-less high-speed compression damping, 17-position rebound damping and adjustable spring preload; 12.3 in. travel
Front Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Rear Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Handlebar: Renthal 971
Front Tire: 80/100-21 Dunlop Geomax MX51FA
Rear Tire: 100/90-19 Dunlop Geomax MX51
Curb Weight: 231 lbs.
Seat Height: 37.4 in
Wheelbase: 58.6 in
Ground Clearance: 12.7 in
Fuel Capacity: 1.66 gal
Color: Red
MSRP: $7420
Honda’s 2014 CRF250R ($7420 plus $310 destination charge) follows in the tire tracks of its larger displacement CRF450R sibling with an important chassis update for more predictable handling on the track and trail. Highlights include an all-new frame, swingarm and up-spec engine configuration for added roost-throwing muscle. For a more in-depth technical analysis check out the 2014 Honda CRF250R First Look, as this article zeroes in on riding impressions and what this quarter-liter CRF is like to moto.
Hop on the CRF and it is clear that the engineers spent a lot of time getting the 250’s weight distribution just right. Even though the ’14 bike weighs four pounds more than the machine it replaces, you’d be hard pressed to notice the difference whether lifting it off the stand or leaning it over through an inside rut.
The 2010-2013 generation CRF was renowned for its sharp steering precision and Big Red’s latest 250 continues to shine in that area. However, it’s far less hyper and more relaxed-feeling than before.
(Top) The CRF250R’s engine features a new cylinder head design with more compression and unique dual-stage fuel injection programming for improved engine response. (Center) The shock is positioned lower in the chassis for added stability and works through a new linkage with a flatter link for better response in motion. (Bottom) After a three-year hiatus, the Honda CRF250R returns to a twin muffler design.
“The chassis felt very balanced and seemed to flex well,” said pro-level test rider Chris See. “You could come into inside rights and put the weight on the front tire and it would go that direction. It was very good.”
Contrary to the latest and greatest air fork technology used on the CRF450R, the 250 still employs a conventional dual coil spring fork. Although it’s relatively old technology, as some say, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ – an accurate synopsis of our feelings of Showa’s tried-and-true design.
Despite not being the newest piece of suspension equipment, we love this fork’s organic feel and straightforward adjustment with it providing adequate pitch control during braking and corner entry over bumps. Our only criticism is that it is a little on the soft side – a typical complaint by faster riders or those who aren't lightweights. Fortunately, the fix is as simple as swap to a heavier pair of springs.
“I think the conventional fork is the way to go,” said See. “I don’t think that either one of the other options [air fork or single function/single coil spring fork] are really proven. I had no real issues with the suspension today. I think it could be definitely a little stiffer all around and for anyone over probably 150 pounds.”
We were also pleased with the function of the shock, which is now positioned lower in the frame. This helps boost stability at speed over bumps and acceleration whoops.
The CRF250R now shares identical and interchangeable body panels and Renthal handlebar (971 bend) as the CRF450R – a big plus for racers who compete in both the 250 and 450 four-stroke classes. Not only do the new plastics look sleek, they are functional providing unencumbered body movements entering and exiting turns as well as through whoops and other obstacles. Another plus is that the capacity of the fuel tank has been increased by almost two-thirds of a quart, so you can ride longer between re-fills.
Motor-wise the CRF250R’s engine continues to have a smooth and well-rounded powerband. Although it didn’t blow us away in any one area, we appreciated the added snappiness of the engine courtesy of Honda’s dual-stage fuel injector map that pre-charges the combustion chamber with an extra squirt of fuel elevating both response and power production.
“The motor was very similar to the 2013,” sums up See. “It did feel like it had slightly more bottom end power but it was very minimal and felt very similar to last year’s bike with a lot of top-end and not very much middle [mid-range]. I feel that the bottom end is decent but it could use one tooth bigger on the rear sprocket to bring the transmission closer together.”
(Top) The most noticeable difference to the Honda CRF250R’s engine is the dual-stage fuel injection mapping which pre-charges the combustion chamber with fuel for added snappiness and engine response at all rpms. (Center) The body panels, 1.66-gallon fuel tank and Renthal 971 bend handlebar are identical to the CRF450R. (Below) The CRF250R has never been lacking in terms of cornering ability. But the new chassis adds an element of refinement and chassis stability making it easier to ride than ever before.
In spite of See’s final drive gearing complaint (13/49) the rest of the Honda’s drivetrain performed flawlessly. The clutch offers well-weighted lever pull and is offers excellent response even with a light two finger tug of it. The transmission also shifted securing in each of its five gears making for a bike that is easy to ride.
While the braking components and the specification of the Dunlop Geomax tires are unchanged both worked well. The brakes offered plenty of stopping power with a fair amount of lever feel and the knobs served up excellent grip on a moist track but were a little squeamish in the morning when the track was dry (the track’s water pump stopped working), but that’s to be expected.
Considering the championship-winning success of the 2013 CRF250R it would have been easy for Honda to leave well enough alone. Instead by incorporating successful and well-received chassis changes from the CRF450R it has produced a 250-class racer that is even more adept at putting in fast laps with ease.
Bore x Stroke: 76.8 x 53.8mm
Compression Ratio: 13.5:1
Fuel Delivery: Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Clutch: Wet multi-plate; cable actuation
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive: Chain; 13/49
Fork: Showa 48mm fork; 16-position compression and 16-position rebound damping adjustment; 12.2 in. travel
Shock: Showa gas charged shock, 13-position low-speed and step-less high-speed compression damping, 17-position rebound damping and adjustable spring preload; 12.3 in. travel
Front Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Rear Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Handlebar: Renthal 971
Front Tire: 80/100-21 Dunlop Geomax MX51FA
Rear Tire: 100/90-19 Dunlop Geomax MX51
Curb Weight: 231 lbs.
Seat Height: 37.4 in
Wheelbase: 58.6 in
Ground Clearance: 12.7 in
Fuel Capacity: 1.66 gal
Color: Red
MSRP: $7420
Honda’s 2014 CRF250R ($7420 plus $310 destination charge) follows in the tire tracks of its larger displacement CRF450R sibling with an important chassis update for more predictable handling on the track and trail. Highlights include an all-new frame, swingarm and up-spec engine configuration for added roost-throwing muscle. For a more in-depth technical analysis check out the 2014 Honda CRF250R First Look, as this article zeroes in on riding impressions and what this quarter-liter CRF is like to moto.
Hop on the CRF and it is clear that the engineers spent a lot of time getting the 250’s weight distribution just right. Even though the ’14 bike weighs four pounds more than the machine it replaces, you’d be hard pressed to notice the difference whether lifting it off the stand or leaning it over through an inside rut.
The 2010-2013 generation CRF was renowned for its sharp steering precision and Big Red’s latest 250 continues to shine in that area. However, it’s far less hyper and more relaxed-feeling than before.
(Top) The CRF250R’s engine features a new cylinder head design with more compression and unique dual-stage fuel injection programming for improved engine response. (Center) The shock is positioned lower in the chassis for added stability and works through a new linkage with a flatter link for better response in motion. (Bottom) After a three-year hiatus, the Honda CRF250R returns to a twin muffler design.
“The chassis felt very balanced and seemed to flex well,” said pro-level test rider Chris See. “You could come into inside rights and put the weight on the front tire and it would go that direction. It was very good.”
Contrary to the latest and greatest air fork technology used on the CRF450R, the 250 still employs a conventional dual coil spring fork. Although it’s relatively old technology, as some say, ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’ – an accurate synopsis of our feelings of Showa’s tried-and-true design.
Despite not being the newest piece of suspension equipment, we love this fork’s organic feel and straightforward adjustment with it providing adequate pitch control during braking and corner entry over bumps. Our only criticism is that it is a little on the soft side – a typical complaint by faster riders or those who aren't lightweights. Fortunately, the fix is as simple as swap to a heavier pair of springs.
“I think the conventional fork is the way to go,” said See. “I don’t think that either one of the other options [air fork or single function/single coil spring fork] are really proven. I had no real issues with the suspension today. I think it could be definitely a little stiffer all around and for anyone over probably 150 pounds.”
We were also pleased with the function of the shock, which is now positioned lower in the frame. This helps boost stability at speed over bumps and acceleration whoops.
The CRF250R now shares identical and interchangeable body panels and Renthal handlebar (971 bend) as the CRF450R – a big plus for racers who compete in both the 250 and 450 four-stroke classes. Not only do the new plastics look sleek, they are functional providing unencumbered body movements entering and exiting turns as well as through whoops and other obstacles. Another plus is that the capacity of the fuel tank has been increased by almost two-thirds of a quart, so you can ride longer between re-fills.
Motor-wise the CRF250R’s engine continues to have a smooth and well-rounded powerband. Although it didn’t blow us away in any one area, we appreciated the added snappiness of the engine courtesy of Honda’s dual-stage fuel injector map that pre-charges the combustion chamber with an extra squirt of fuel elevating both response and power production.
“The motor was very similar to the 2013,” sums up See. “It did feel like it had slightly more bottom end power but it was very minimal and felt very similar to last year’s bike with a lot of top-end and not very much middle [mid-range]. I feel that the bottom end is decent but it could use one tooth bigger on the rear sprocket to bring the transmission closer together.”
(Top) The most noticeable difference to the Honda CRF250R’s engine is the dual-stage fuel injection mapping which pre-charges the combustion chamber with fuel for added snappiness and engine response at all rpms. (Center) The body panels, 1.66-gallon fuel tank and Renthal 971 bend handlebar are identical to the CRF450R. (Below) The CRF250R has never been lacking in terms of cornering ability. But the new chassis adds an element of refinement and chassis stability making it easier to ride than ever before.
In spite of See’s final drive gearing complaint (13/49) the rest of the Honda’s drivetrain performed flawlessly. The clutch offers well-weighted lever pull and is offers excellent response even with a light two finger tug of it. The transmission also shifted securing in each of its five gears making for a bike that is easy to ride.
While the braking components and the specification of the Dunlop Geomax tires are unchanged both worked well. The brakes offered plenty of stopping power with a fair amount of lever feel and the knobs served up excellent grip on a moist track but were a little squeamish in the morning when the track was dry (the track’s water pump stopped working), but that’s to be expected.
Considering the championship-winning success of the 2013 CRF250R it would have been easy for Honda to leave well enough alone. Instead by incorporating successful and well-received chassis changes from the CRF450R it has produced a 250-class racer that is even more adept at putting in fast laps with ease.
2014 Honda CRF450R First Ride
Engine: 449cc liquid-cooled Single, SOHC, 4-valves Bore x Stroke: 96.0 x 62.1mm
Compression Ratio: 12.5:1
Fuel Delivery: Fuel-injection
Clutch: Wet multi-plate, cable actuation
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive Gearing: 13/48
Front Suspension: Kayaba Pneumatic Spring 48mm Fork, 16-position compression and 18-position rebound damping adjustment; 12.2 in. travel
Rear Suspension: Pro-Link equipped Kayaba, 20-position low-speed and step-less high-speed compression damping, 18-position rebound damping and adjustable spring preload; 12.5 in. travel
Front Brake: 240mm disc, double-piston caliper
Rear Brake: 240mm disc, single-piston caliper
Handlebar: Renthal
Tires: Dunlop Geomax MX51 80/100-21, 120/90-19
Curb Weight: 243 lbs. (ready to ride)
Wheelbase: 58.7 in.
Length: 86.0 in.
Width: 32.7 in.
Ground Clearance: 13.0 in.
Seat Height: 37.5 in.
Fuel Capacity: 1.66 gal.
MSRP: $8699 plus $310 destination charge
After years of fumbling around the track and trail, Honda finally got it right with its new and significantly improved-for-2013 CRF450R. For ’14 the powersports giant makes a few calculated tweaks to the front suspension, engine intake and exhaust, as well as the clutch. But are the updates worth the $300 price increase? We put in a few motos at the track to find out.
Raise the CRF450R off the stand and it’s obvious that its still one of the lightest 450 motocross bikes in the class. Honda claims 243 pounds, ready to ride, and it certainly feels that way. Seated at the controls it has a slim yet well-portioned feel and is one of the more neutral-feeling motocross bikes made, which makes it easy to get acclimated to.
“I love how the cockpit fits me,” says pro-level test rider Chris See, who stands at 5’9”. “I feel right at home on it.”
While getting the engine lit is easier than ever before it still requires a deliberate and well-timed prod of the kickstarter to get it to fire on the first try. Usually it takes two. Engineers fitted different clutch springs that reduce clutch lever pull effort without compromising strength and resistance to fade during long rides. Although the update doesn’t make that much of a difference when launching, it does pay dividends during a moto with the rider having to exert less hand and finger effort to modulate engine power through turns.
The CRF continues to use a six-spring clutch but the tension of the springs has been reduced for easier lever pull.
The CRF450Rs mufflers have updated internals for improved flow.
The shape of the ports within the cylinder head were modified for improved flow. The update works together with the new dual-charge fuel injection map for increased throttle response.
(Top) The CRF continues to use a six-spring clutch but the tension of the springs has been reduced for easier lever pull. (Center) The CRF450R’s mufflers have updated internals for improved flow. (Below) The shape of the ports within the cylinder head were modified for improved flow. The update works together with the new dual-charge fuel injection map for increased throttle response.
“The clutch feel with the new springs is good,” confirms our tester. “It’s got very good feedback to the rider.”
Get into the throttle and the CRF feels a tad peppier than the ’13 bike. It’s not a huge difference but it does have some added snap, especially at low throttle settings. This is accomplished by new fuel injection mapping that signals the injector to squirt two shots of gas instead of one per engine revolution. The first charge cools the combustion chamber while the second blast creates driving force. It works in conjunction with the updated cylinder head porting, and reshaped pipe interior giving it a little more ‘oomph when the throttle is cracked.
“The dual injector spark gives it a little more bottom end this year, which is appreciated,” agrees Chris “With a little bit of mapping tweaks I think it could be even better.”
Overall the powerband is still one of the most tractable and rider-friendly in the 450-class. It will be appreciated by all but those who are seeking a really aggressive and hard-hitting punch, for say riding in super loamy terrain or wet sand. And for that small niche Big Red offers its PGM-FI Tuning Kit ($489.95) allowing the user to quite literally tailor the feel and power of the engine. Still it would be nice if Honda could offer a few quick and simple engine power adjustments via plastic couplers like the Green and Yellow brands.
We’re big fans of the way the new generation CRF handles as it responds to rider inputs in a more predictable and consistent manner building confidence behind the handlebar. But the weak link in the handling department is the newly introduced air fork sourced from Showa.
We appreciated the ability to adjust ride height/preload/spring rate, based on rider weight or preference, by adding or subtracting air pressure, but the fork didn’t function predictably on rough terrain. Honda acknowledged the problem and attempts to correct it by fitting a revised rebound piston and rod internals, which help maintain that nice plush, bump-absorbing feel as the fork travels deeper in its 12.2-inch stroke. The difference is considerable with the second version providing more accurate damping especially during the course of a moto, but still we’re not completely sold on the technology.
“The air fork for me is not my favorite,” Chris admits. “I feel like it isn’t a very consistent feel. As you go on in the 15-minute, 20, 25-minute riding increments it starts to get a little harsh… and a little more harsh, so you have to mess with it [modify the settings].”
The CRF450R continues to impress us with its high degree of maneuverability in the sky as well as on the ground.
The engine offers a little more snap at low rpm yet still is easy to manage as the rpms increase.
We love the centralized feel of the CRF450R. It is a very agile bike which increases confidence and makes it easier and more fun to ride.
(Top) The CRF450R continues to impress us with its high degree of maneuverability in the sky as well as on the ground. (Center) The engine offers a little more snap at low rpm yet still is easy to manage as the rpms increase. (Below) We love the centralized feel of the CRF450R. It is a very agile bike which increases confidence and makes it easier (and more fun) to ride.
If you ride on smooth tracks or for short periods of time the air fork works marvelously but for more challenging conditions it still lacks the consistent damping feel of a conventional dual coil spring set-up as used on the ’12 and prior CRF450Rs.
Although w e aren’t completely sold on the air fork, we can’t argue with the way the red bike carves into turns. Whether blasting around a long fast berm or darting across the track for a tight inside rut this CRF goes right where the rider directs with very little effort for a big four-stroke.
“The Honda corners very well. You can put the bike anywhere you want it. It is very maneuverable and that is a big plus for me.”
The red bike’s braking hard parts, unchanged for 2014, continue to provide ample stopping power and lever feel.
After a day’s ride it’s certain that the refinements made to the ‘14 CRF net a better overall package. Even with its added bottom-end ‘oomph, the engine continues to be easy to use on track and when paired with the lithe and neutral steering chassis allow fast laps to come with reduced effort behind the handlebar.
Compression Ratio: 12.5:1
Fuel Delivery: Fuel-injection
Clutch: Wet multi-plate, cable actuation
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive Gearing: 13/48
Front Suspension: Kayaba Pneumatic Spring 48mm Fork, 16-position compression and 18-position rebound damping adjustment; 12.2 in. travel
Rear Suspension: Pro-Link equipped Kayaba, 20-position low-speed and step-less high-speed compression damping, 18-position rebound damping and adjustable spring preload; 12.5 in. travel
Front Brake: 240mm disc, double-piston caliper
Rear Brake: 240mm disc, single-piston caliper
Handlebar: Renthal
Tires: Dunlop Geomax MX51 80/100-21, 120/90-19
Curb Weight: 243 lbs. (ready to ride)
Wheelbase: 58.7 in.
Length: 86.0 in.
Width: 32.7 in.
Ground Clearance: 13.0 in.
Seat Height: 37.5 in.
Fuel Capacity: 1.66 gal.
MSRP: $8699 plus $310 destination charge
After years of fumbling around the track and trail, Honda finally got it right with its new and significantly improved-for-2013 CRF450R. For ’14 the powersports giant makes a few calculated tweaks to the front suspension, engine intake and exhaust, as well as the clutch. But are the updates worth the $300 price increase? We put in a few motos at the track to find out.
Raise the CRF450R off the stand and it’s obvious that its still one of the lightest 450 motocross bikes in the class. Honda claims 243 pounds, ready to ride, and it certainly feels that way. Seated at the controls it has a slim yet well-portioned feel and is one of the more neutral-feeling motocross bikes made, which makes it easy to get acclimated to.
“I love how the cockpit fits me,” says pro-level test rider Chris See, who stands at 5’9”. “I feel right at home on it.”
While getting the engine lit is easier than ever before it still requires a deliberate and well-timed prod of the kickstarter to get it to fire on the first try. Usually it takes two. Engineers fitted different clutch springs that reduce clutch lever pull effort without compromising strength and resistance to fade during long rides. Although the update doesn’t make that much of a difference when launching, it does pay dividends during a moto with the rider having to exert less hand and finger effort to modulate engine power through turns.
The CRF continues to use a six-spring clutch but the tension of the springs has been reduced for easier lever pull.
The CRF450Rs mufflers have updated internals for improved flow.
The shape of the ports within the cylinder head were modified for improved flow. The update works together with the new dual-charge fuel injection map for increased throttle response.
(Top) The CRF continues to use a six-spring clutch but the tension of the springs has been reduced for easier lever pull. (Center) The CRF450R’s mufflers have updated internals for improved flow. (Below) The shape of the ports within the cylinder head were modified for improved flow. The update works together with the new dual-charge fuel injection map for increased throttle response.
“The clutch feel with the new springs is good,” confirms our tester. “It’s got very good feedback to the rider.”
Get into the throttle and the CRF feels a tad peppier than the ’13 bike. It’s not a huge difference but it does have some added snap, especially at low throttle settings. This is accomplished by new fuel injection mapping that signals the injector to squirt two shots of gas instead of one per engine revolution. The first charge cools the combustion chamber while the second blast creates driving force. It works in conjunction with the updated cylinder head porting, and reshaped pipe interior giving it a little more ‘oomph when the throttle is cracked.
“The dual injector spark gives it a little more bottom end this year, which is appreciated,” agrees Chris “With a little bit of mapping tweaks I think it could be even better.”
Overall the powerband is still one of the most tractable and rider-friendly in the 450-class. It will be appreciated by all but those who are seeking a really aggressive and hard-hitting punch, for say riding in super loamy terrain or wet sand. And for that small niche Big Red offers its PGM-FI Tuning Kit ($489.95) allowing the user to quite literally tailor the feel and power of the engine. Still it would be nice if Honda could offer a few quick and simple engine power adjustments via plastic couplers like the Green and Yellow brands.
We’re big fans of the way the new generation CRF handles as it responds to rider inputs in a more predictable and consistent manner building confidence behind the handlebar. But the weak link in the handling department is the newly introduced air fork sourced from Showa.
We appreciated the ability to adjust ride height/preload/spring rate, based on rider weight or preference, by adding or subtracting air pressure, but the fork didn’t function predictably on rough terrain. Honda acknowledged the problem and attempts to correct it by fitting a revised rebound piston and rod internals, which help maintain that nice plush, bump-absorbing feel as the fork travels deeper in its 12.2-inch stroke. The difference is considerable with the second version providing more accurate damping especially during the course of a moto, but still we’re not completely sold on the technology.
“The air fork for me is not my favorite,” Chris admits. “I feel like it isn’t a very consistent feel. As you go on in the 15-minute, 20, 25-minute riding increments it starts to get a little harsh… and a little more harsh, so you have to mess with it [modify the settings].”
The CRF450R continues to impress us with its high degree of maneuverability in the sky as well as on the ground.
The engine offers a little more snap at low rpm yet still is easy to manage as the rpms increase.
We love the centralized feel of the CRF450R. It is a very agile bike which increases confidence and makes it easier and more fun to ride.
(Top) The CRF450R continues to impress us with its high degree of maneuverability in the sky as well as on the ground. (Center) The engine offers a little more snap at low rpm yet still is easy to manage as the rpms increase. (Below) We love the centralized feel of the CRF450R. It is a very agile bike which increases confidence and makes it easier (and more fun) to ride.
If you ride on smooth tracks or for short periods of time the air fork works marvelously but for more challenging conditions it still lacks the consistent damping feel of a conventional dual coil spring set-up as used on the ’12 and prior CRF450Rs.
Although w e aren’t completely sold on the air fork, we can’t argue with the way the red bike carves into turns. Whether blasting around a long fast berm or darting across the track for a tight inside rut this CRF goes right where the rider directs with very little effort for a big four-stroke.
“The Honda corners very well. You can put the bike anywhere you want it. It is very maneuverable and that is a big plus for me.”
The red bike’s braking hard parts, unchanged for 2014, continue to provide ample stopping power and lever feel.
After a day’s ride it’s certain that the refinements made to the ‘14 CRF net a better overall package. Even with its added bottom-end ‘oomph, the engine continues to be easy to use on track and when paired with the lithe and neutral steering chassis allow fast laps to come with reduced effort behind the handlebar.
Tuesday, 11 February 2014
2014 Honda CRF250R Comparison
Bore x Stroke: 76.8 x 53.8mm
Compression Ratio: 13.5:1
Fuel Delivery: Programmed Fuel Injection (PGM-FI), 46mm throttle body
Clutch: Wet multi-plate; cable actuation
Transmission: Five-speed
Final Drive: Chain; 13/49
Fork: Showa 48mm fork; 16-position compression and 16-position rebound damping adjustment; 12.2 in. travel
Shock: Showa gas charged shock, 13-position low-speed and step-less high-speed compression damping, 17-position rebound damping and adjustable spring preload; 12.3 in. travel
Front Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Rear Brake: 240mm disc, dual-piston caliper
Handlebar: Renthal 971
Front Tire: 80/100-21 Dunlop Geomax MX51FA
Rear Tire: 100/90-19 Dunlop Geomax MX51
Curb Weight: 231 lbs.
Seat Height: 37.4 in
Wheelbase: 58.6 in
Ground Clearance: 12.7 in
Fuel Capacity: 1.66 gal
Color: Red
MSRP: $7420
How does the 2014 Honda CRF250R stack up against the competition? Watch the 2014 Honda CRF250R Comparison Video to find out.
Last year the Honda CRF250R tied for the win in MotoUSA's 250 Motocross Shootout thanks to its easy-to-ride character and excellent handling. Honda didn’t rest on its laurels, however, and redesigned its 250cc-class offering for 2014 in the constant search for more power and improved handling. The CRF250 has always finished near the top of the list in our shootouts, could it do it again this year?
In the last few years the Honda CRF250R has been regarded as one of the easiest 250cc class racers to ride. Just about anyone can jump on, adjust the sag and levers and immediately feel at home. For 2014 Honda’s engineers gave the CRF a new frame to further enhance its easy-to-ride character with a lower center of gravity. A revised swingarm and linkage also intend to make the Honda a ripper. Our team of riders agreed with the changes made by Big Red, ranking it Number-1 in the handling department. It continues to inspire confidence with a neutral feel in the corners and excellent straight-line stability. It always works no matter the situation.
Former WMX racer Sara Price comments, “Overall handling on the Honda was really good and I ranked it first in my book. I felt quite comfortable when going fast and found myself not wanting to get off the thing.”
“The chassis on the new Honda works well,” adds our resident pro tester Chris See. “I always had lots of confidence on this bike.
While the handling was top-notch, the suspension did not rank as high for our team. The rear shock is unchanged from 2013, but the 48mm Showa forks features new settings. Even so just about every rider complained of a too-soft set-up and it ranked near the bottom, negating its top finish in the Handling Category.
“Testing the Honda in stock form - it was soft for me and that kept it out of the top spot for sure,” explains See. “But I am also really happy they stuck with the traditional fork on this machine, giving you a nice consistent feel lap after lap.”
The CRF250R has never been known as a ripper when it comes to sheer engine output, but Honda beefed things up for 2014 with a dual stage injector. However, with powerhouses like the Kawasaki, KTM and now Yamaha cranking out big power, the Honda 250 feels like it is just plain slow. The mellow output does make for a more settled chassis and excellent manners when the track is slippery, but when traction is tacky or loam is deep the CRF gets left behind on the bottom end.
“I love how far the top-end revs out, but I feel this bike needs to sacrifice how far it revs out and give it a lot more bottom so it has more forgiveness when you make mistake," explains See.
Pro rider Nick Thiel is kinder to the CRF saying, “The Honda doesn't do anything bad it just lacks the ripping power that those in front of it provide.”
While we were not blown away with the seat-of-the-pants power output, on the MotoUSA Dynojet 250i the Honda held its own with a chart-topping 18.96 lb-ft of torque that crushed all the but the Yamaha by nearly three-quarters of a lb-ft. It didn’t fare as well in the horsepower numbers with a fourth-best result, laying down 34.96 hp.
When the gate drops the CRF250R falls slightly behind with a 3.239-second run to the 125-foot mark at 44.2 mph, giving up nearly one tenth of a second to the class leading YZ250F. It’s excellent torque numbers come into play, however, in the Roll-On test, as it posted a second-place 2.266-second blast from 15 to 40 mph in 95.3 feet.
Other hard numbers in our test show the 2014 CRF250R grabbing top honors in the sound test with a much quieter result from its dual mufflers at 97 decibels at idle and 108db at half throttle. It also earned second-place points on the scales at 235 pounds with its 1.66-gallon gas tank filled.
Back on the track our riders ranked it just behind the Kawasaki KX250F in terms of comfort and cockpit layout. Its larger layout works well for a variety of rider sizes, and the slimmer mid section is a hit with most. Only one rider has any criticism for the Honda’s ergonomics.
“I’m not a huge fan of how when you go to transfer to the rear of the bike you go from skinny and narrow in the middle to wide and chunky at the front and back,” complains See. “I preferred last year’s ergos to this year.”
Honda widened the physical size of the transmission gears for better durability, and our riders all think highly of the CRF’s drivetrain ranking it as the runner-up in the category. If not for some fairly annoying clutch fade, the Honda may have taken top honors as the feel is tight and gearing spot-on.
“The Honda’s gearing is perfect and the clutch pull is really good,” remarks Thiel. “But after two laps the clutch lever is practically to the bars.”
On the brakes the CFR250R ranks mid-pack this year. While the feel and power are excellent, some of the faster riders experienced fade as the end of the moto approached. The rear brake also lacks feel when the track gets slippery and locks easily.
For the first time in a decade the Honda CRF250R finishes off the podium. If not for a lackluster power feel the plucky and always-agreeable Honda would have surely finished on the box yet again. For those looking to ride all day rather than win the 250 Pro Class, the 2014 Honda CRF250R is still a excellent choice. But in our highly competitive 250 Motocross Shootout, the CRF finishes in fourth place.
Last year the Honda CRF250R tied for the win in MotoUSA's 250 Motocross Shootout thanks to its easy-to-ride character and excellent handling. Honda didn’t rest on its laurels, however, and redesigned its 250cc-class offering for 2014 in the constant search for more power and improved handling. The CRF250 has always finished near the top of the list in our shootouts, could it do it again this year?
In the last few years the Honda CRF250R has been regarded as one of the easiest 250cc class racers to ride. Just about anyone can jump on, adjust the sag and levers and immediately feel at home. For 2014 Honda’s engineers gave the CRF a new frame to further enhance its easy-to-ride character with a lower center of gravity. A revised swingarm and linkage also intend to make the Honda a ripper. Our team of riders agreed with the changes made by Big Red, ranking it Number-1 in the handling department. It continues to inspire confidence with a neutral feel in the corners and excellent straight-line stability. It always works no matter the situation.
Former WMX racer Sara Price comments, “Overall handling on the Honda was really good and I ranked it first in my book. I felt quite comfortable when going fast and found myself not wanting to get off the thing.”
“The chassis on the new Honda works well,” adds our resident pro tester Chris See. “I always had lots of confidence on this bike.
While the handling was top-notch, the suspension did not rank as high for our team. The rear shock is unchanged from 2013, but the 48mm Showa forks features new settings. Even so just about every rider complained of a too-soft set-up and it ranked near the bottom, negating its top finish in the Handling Category.
“Testing the Honda in stock form - it was soft for me and that kept it out of the top spot for sure,” explains See. “But I am also really happy they stuck with the traditional fork on this machine, giving you a nice consistent feel lap after lap.”
The CRF250R has never been known as a ripper when it comes to sheer engine output, but Honda beefed things up for 2014 with a dual stage injector. However, with powerhouses like the Kawasaki, KTM and now Yamaha cranking out big power, the Honda 250 feels like it is just plain slow. The mellow output does make for a more settled chassis and excellent manners when the track is slippery, but when traction is tacky or loam is deep the CRF gets left behind on the bottom end.
“I love how far the top-end revs out, but I feel this bike needs to sacrifice how far it revs out and give it a lot more bottom so it has more forgiveness when you make mistake," explains See.
Pro rider Nick Thiel is kinder to the CRF saying, “The Honda doesn't do anything bad it just lacks the ripping power that those in front of it provide.”
While we were not blown away with the seat-of-the-pants power output, on the MotoUSA Dynojet 250i the Honda held its own with a chart-topping 18.96 lb-ft of torque that crushed all the but the Yamaha by nearly three-quarters of a lb-ft. It didn’t fare as well in the horsepower numbers with a fourth-best result, laying down 34.96 hp.
When the gate drops the CRF250R falls slightly behind with a 3.239-second run to the 125-foot mark at 44.2 mph, giving up nearly one tenth of a second to the class leading YZ250F. It’s excellent torque numbers come into play, however, in the Roll-On test, as it posted a second-place 2.266-second blast from 15 to 40 mph in 95.3 feet.
Other hard numbers in our test show the 2014 CRF250R grabbing top honors in the sound test with a much quieter result from its dual mufflers at 97 decibels at idle and 108db at half throttle. It also earned second-place points on the scales at 235 pounds with its 1.66-gallon gas tank filled.
Back on the track our riders ranked it just behind the Kawasaki KX250F in terms of comfort and cockpit layout. Its larger layout works well for a variety of rider sizes, and the slimmer mid section is a hit with most. Only one rider has any criticism for the Honda’s ergonomics.
“I’m not a huge fan of how when you go to transfer to the rear of the bike you go from skinny and narrow in the middle to wide and chunky at the front and back,” complains See. “I preferred last year’s ergos to this year.”
Honda widened the physical size of the transmission gears for better durability, and our riders all think highly of the CRF’s drivetrain ranking it as the runner-up in the category. If not for some fairly annoying clutch fade, the Honda may have taken top honors as the feel is tight and gearing spot-on.
“The Honda’s gearing is perfect and the clutch pull is really good,” remarks Thiel. “But after two laps the clutch lever is practically to the bars.”
On the brakes the CFR250R ranks mid-pack this year. While the feel and power are excellent, some of the faster riders experienced fade as the end of the moto approached. The rear brake also lacks feel when the track gets slippery and locks easily.
For the first time in a decade the Honda CRF250R finishes off the podium. If not for a lackluster power feel the plucky and always-agreeable Honda would have surely finished on the box yet again. For those looking to ride all day rather than win the 250 Pro Class, the 2014 Honda CRF250R is still a excellent choice. But in our highly competitive 250 Motocross Shootout, the CRF finishes in fourth place.
Tuesday, 4 February 2014
2004 Suzuki V-Strom 650
Despite having a face only a mother could love, Yoko Ono was able to score one of the late-'60s most desirable bachelors, Beatle John Lennon. Obviously, there was more to her than meets the offended eye.
And so it is with the new Suzuki DL650 V-Strom, a wonderfully competent bike that might be overlooked because of an appearance that might be diplomatically termed as "funky." So we ask you to overlook the superficial, as Lennon did, and give this piece a chance.
Emotions were mixed as I set off across the SoCal desert toward Indian Wells for the press introduction of the baby V-Strom. We were already converts to the sweetness of the SV650's 645cc 90-degree V-Twin, the powerplant loaned to the new DL, so we expected good things there. But, we wondered, how could this pseudo dirt bike possibly be as good a package as the SV, a perennial winner in the smile-per-mile category?
As we set off on a clear but cool desert morning, I wasn't the only one among the moto press to be grateful for the extra wind protection afforded by the effective fairing as we streaked down I-10 toward the east entrance to Joshua Tree National Park. New to the DL line in '04 (yes, the 1000, too) is a three-position windscreen. Airflow was directed just barely over the helmet on my 5'8" body with the screen in its center position. Taller riders were bothered by buffeting, but had their complaints addressed by moving the screen to its tallest position, a process that takes about five minutes and puts the screen in a more upright angle. At lower speeds, oncoming air gets deflected up and around a rider's helmet, resulting in faceshield-open riding becoming a viable option.
After a day in the saddle of the DL650 V-Strom, we came away gushing about it.
An indicated 80-mph cruise saw the tach spinning up at 5900 rpm, a reminder that Suzuki added three teeth to the DL's rear sprocket to give it the added snap necessary to compare with the 41-lb. lighter SV650S. Suzuki says the DL has about 5% more midrange power than the SV thanks to a smaller airbox, different cams and muffler, though they didn't mention how peak power was affected. The changes all seems to work well together and, despite the lower gearing, the V-Strom is able to top 125 mph with the speedo needle still rising... or so we heard.
In addition to the adjustable windscreen, the V-Strom 650 brings along a new instrument panel to the DL line. Simple dual analog dials serve up easily assimilated speed and rev information, while a center LCD panel has the info desirable to the adventure-touring rider, such as dual tripmeters, a clock, and fuel and coolant temperature gauges. A healthy 5.8-gallon tank will take you 200 miles between fill-ups.
Joshua Tree, for those who haven't been there, isn't your typical National Park. Bizarre-looking rock formations sprouting out of the ground are as prevalent as the sparse vegetation, and the park road takes a meandering path through the arid desolation.
Despite its gangly appearance, the V-Strom can make quick work of the twisty bits.
Ergos are nearly identical to the bigger DL, just about perfect for the V-Strom's mission, with wrists only taking a small amount of pressure. It's all-day comfy. The only change from the big DL is a different seat. At a reasonable 32.3 inches, the seat is 20mm lower and has diagonal cutaways at its side edges that allow shorter legs to have a straighter shot at the ground, giving newbs and the vertically challenged more confidence during low-speed maneuvering. Even so, the six-plus-footers on our trip reported there is ample legroom.
Although the DL650 isn't as nimble as the high and wide bars suggest, it can be hustled through twisties at a quick rate. It steers slower than the SV in part because of the tall front wheel/tire, but also because it shares the frame, fork, wheels and brakes with the 996cc DL. Still, the little V-Strom is said to be 40 lbs. lighter, due mostly to the smaller engine and to a less robust swingarm.
The 43mm fork is outwardly identical to the big V-Strom, but it doesn't have the DL1000's more advanced cartridge internals. Laid at a 26-degree rake (26.5 for the 1000; 25.0 on the SV650), the Showa fork has provisions only for preload adjustment. Preload on the rear shock can be dialed in hydraulically with a handy knurled knob below the seat, just like a BMW; rebound damping is also adjustable.
Aboard the V-Strom 650, a rider's destination could be just about anywhere.
But if you wanted a GSX-R, or an SV for that matter, you wouldn't be considering a DL. Not only is the V-Strom way more comfortable, but it also has the capability to take you places where the others would fear to tread. Although Suzuki says the V-Strom isn't really meant to go off road, we couldn't resist testing its capabilities and that of its Trail Wing 'Stones.
With a 417-lb. claimed dry weight and road-biased rubber, the 650 isn't gonna win many enduros, but it actually takes to loose conditions fairly well. Venturing off the beaten path and into a couple of unpaved campground areas proved the V-Strom can be slid and tossed around in ways that would make a Ducati 999 rider spill his bladder inside his Daineses. A bountiful 40 degrees of steering lock lets the DL maneuver in tight spaces, whether piloting a course around a boulder or an Escalade. Later on we were forced to ride several miles on a gravel road that was under construction, and here the relaxed fork angle and a fairly generous 110mm of trail kept the Swiss Army Bike on its intended path even if the feedback from the soft surface indicated otherwise.
Taking the SV650's sweet V-Twin and tucking it into the DL1000's frame proves to be a good concoction.
Aiding the V-Strom's low-traction performance is its ultra-smooth throttle take-up, with none of the abruptness endemic to many injected bikes. Suzuki's Dual Throttle Valve (SDTV) uses a computer to control the throttle body's upper butterfly in relation to engine speed and throttle position, giving just the responses a rider expects. Also helping the DL mete out power is a heavier starter clutch that adds weight to the engine's rotational mass. The V-Twin engine, as all 90-degree Twins, has perfect primary balance, although a DL rider can feel a hint of secondary vibes at 6000 rpm. Otherwise, this engine is super-smooth, even more so than its big brother.
The V-Twin, like in the SV, is a real gem, but adrenaline-hungry pilots might become bored with it. There is no real hit in its powerband, meaning there's power whenever it needs to be summoned, which is good. But step off an SV and onto a DL, and you'll notice a less enthusiastic rush to the 10,500-rpm redline. On the plus side, Suzuki has once again done a magnificent job with a gearbox, with smooth but positive cog swapping and easily accomplished downshifts. We liked the high-mount muffler that tucks in nicely, though we were less impressed with the flaccid exhaust note for a V-Twin (although easily preferable to Yoko's singing). California bikes receive a catalyzer to reduce emissions, and that attractive, aluminum-looking exhaust shield is actually plastic.
An adjustable brake lever lets even small hands get good purchase to aid the 2-piston, pin-slide calipers and 310mm front rotors in hauling the DL down from speed, they are not supersport-spec, but they are plenty powerful for the V-Strom's mission. Out back, a single piston caliper bites on a large 260mm disc, but it feels numb and weak. If the brakes didn't get you slowed in time, the effective rear-view mirrors will offer a good view of the Highway Patrol coming up behind you.
The black V-Strom looks like it was plucked from the set of Road Warrior.
It has the power and smoothness to dust a BMW F650, and it offers more comfort and wind protection than the SV650/S, Honda 599 and Triumph Speed Four. Its closest competitor is likely Yamaha's buzzier but faster FZ6, which shares a similar riding position, fairing coverage and price tag. The FZ is definitely faster in a straight line, but its R6-based engine isn't as adept as the smooth and torquey DL's Twin. And with its standard luggage rack and optional hard luggage, the V-Strom is much more the SUV as opposed to the FZ's sports coupe. In a way, the DL650 is the Honda VFR of the adventure-touring segment, offering versatility, a sporting nature and Lexus smoothness.
As the day's light faded into the horizon on the way back to the hotel and the subtly attractive orange glow of the instruments matched the color of the setting sun, it was hard to imagine another machine with a competitive versatility-per-dollar ratio. At $6599 in blue or black, the new V-Strom is sure to attract the type of guys who prefer smart and loving, if a bit homely, women over more attractive but temperamental ones.
You can't tell what the DL looks like from on top, and perhaps John felt the same about Yoko.
Share your thoughts on the '04 Suzuki V-Strom in the MCUSA Forum.
2004 Suzuki SV650 Comparison
On the street, the SV's motor is a gem. As is typical for a longer stroke motor like a V-Twin, especially one with a 46cc displacement advantage, it cranks out better power down low than the Multis, even if its top-end numbers (72.2 horsepower at 9200 rpm) pale in comparison. What this means, plain and simple, is that the SV makes the most ponies and most torque anytime the revs are below 9000 rpm. How much time do you spend revving your streetbike above 10 grand, anyway?
Well, for those raised riding inline-Fours, like our guest tester Heidi Mattison, riding the V-Twin Suzuki for the first time was a new version of reality.
"Having zero experience on a Twin of any kind, I redlined the bike a half a dozen times my first time out," said the CBR600F4i racer. "I became very disappointed with the power above nine grand because I expected it to be there. I decided I would never own an SV and never recommend an SV. After some probing from the other guys on the trip (her words, Ed), I decided to give it another shot. It took some time getting used to the power at such a low rpm as I began to short-shift the bike, but my comfort level eventually came around. I was amazed at how much power was there by bogging it through the tight turns and dirty pavement."
Unlike the SV, Heidi quickly made friends with the Triumph Speed Four. That's not surprising when you consider the TT600 upon which the Speed Four is based feels a lot like a CBR600F4, and she rides an F4i. Gabe, the other F4i owner in our group, also took a liking to the Speed Cubed.
"It's almost as fast as my F4i, but the motor doesn't have the same top-end rush that the Honda does," says the bike distributor/salesman/journalist/lawyer. "Otherwise the two bikes feel similar in weight, handling and engine performance."
The Suzuki's V-Twin sprints out of the gate with the most power at low rpm before being overtaken once the four-cylinders get spooled up. Note the how the Triumph falls off the pipe from 8500-10,000 rpm, the only flaw in its enjoyable powerband. Click on the image to get full size dyno results.
Although sport-touring isn't in the Speed Four's list of top priorities, the Brit bike actually does quite well on the freeway. Its body-colored plastic prow over the headlights does a surprisingly respectable job at deflecting air, and it was made at least 50% more effective with the addition of a tinted Laminar Lip. This clever device helps to funnel air further upward to provide a larger cocoon of protection, and at just $75, it is a solid investment in rider comfort. Look for a product test in the coming months.
Our riders had praise for the S4's nicely padded, supportive and roomy seat, and according to Gabe, "the pegs are just where I would put them if it were left to me." But Gabriel raised a bit of Cain when the topic of handlebars came up. "The clip-ons make no sense on this hooligan-y kind of bike. Triumph doesn't offer a handlebar kit, either."
With the most oversquare engine architecture of the Fours, the Triumph has about as much of a chance of winning a tractor-pull event as the Yamaha. There is nobody in the engine room below 3000 rpm, necessitating some clutch slipping leaving stoplights, and a minor hole in its powerband makes roll-on acceleration a bit flaccid depending on the speed and gear. Still, its 85.3 horsepower is right in the hunt, and its quarter-mile run was just a click behind the quickest of the pack, an 11.47 to the top-dog FZ6's 11.37.
There's about a jillion corners to be found between LA to Monterey, and we tried to hit them all during our meandering journey. In this kind of snaking environment there's no way something nicknamed the Couch could ever hope to keep up with a Speed Four, the nastiest bike in this group by a wide margin. In the twisty bits, the S4's track-worthy chassis and premium suspension components set it apart.
"The thing just hammers through high-speed turns without wallowing or moving on bumps," says Gabe, an experienced road racer. "The shock is able to keep the wheel on the ground even at insane speeds on very bumpy, twisty roads. And t he Four's ability on bumpy, slow roads surprised me."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)